5-day-workshop for a 2F HP Turbine in Germany

(ERNI e.V., www.erni-kollektiv.org) together with the VHS Braunschweig conduct a 5-day-workshop for a 2F HP Turbine from 14th to 15th May in Braunschweig, Germany.

Application is available here: https://www.vhs-braunschweig.de/die-vhs-braunschweig/kurssuche/kurs/Workshop-zum-Bau-einer-Kleinstwindkraftanlage/nr/BMUB01/bereich/details/

Costs: 70€ for all 5 days

Information flier here

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

More from Mac in Wyoming

hello again from Wyoming.. The larger wind generator at 45 mph + winds is doing a whooping 150 to 200 amps.  24 volts battery bank.

Maybe would do more, but tail cuts out of wind after 45 or 50 mph winds. 

The machine probably does 44 volts at a higher output. Battery bank voltage is 28.2. i guess the loss in the wire is the resistance.  

I used the same magnet as you used on your 8ft turbine, 1/2″ x 1 ” x 2″ . And used 40 copper coils, 20 inner coils and 20 outer coils. 17 gauge wire, 150 turns. Resin thickness 3/4″.  Inner coils are off set from outer coils, but magnets are in line so to make it smoother turning, and it was. Inner coils are together with 1 neutral ring. And outer coils are isolated from the inner coils with there own Neutral . It seems that the inner coils start to make power a little sooner than the outer coils. Same amount of magnates passing the coils on both inner and outer of the stater, but the inner coils are a little closer together than the outer  coils because of diameter. But the volt is not much different, maybe 2 volts. I guess the phase lag is different than the other. But is seems to work good. SO 20 coils are hooked to a neutral and the other 20 coils are hooked to a neutral . 40 WIRES are a lot to hook up to the 20,  10 amp rectifier that are on a aulimum heat sink. I wish i would have used bigger rectifiers but i thought i it was only going to make MAX 120 amps. i was wrong. it makes much more.But thank God that they hold up Ok. With a RPM meter, a little hand held one that i have with a lazer and a sticker you put on it. At 90 rpms it produced 24 volts. Blades seem to work well with the gen. At around 5 mph it is making around 4 or 5 amps. Sometimes it takes 6 mph wind to start the turbine, but sometimes much less like 3mph.

With that much power, i was concerned about heat produced, so designed it so air flow can get through coils for better cooling. 

In the middle of coils i used tapped wood block that was waxed, and screw to hold it in place. Then before i poured it, i put tape on top, so resin would not get in there, and leave a hold for more cooling on high out put. The small wood blocks must be tapped and waxed so they can be removed after screw is removed. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Open source design tool for alternators

I got this from Kostas today:

OpenAFPM: An open source software tool for modelling and designing axial flux permanent magnet generators in wind electric systems

Update THERE WILL BE A WEBINAR ON 19th April where you can learn how to use the tool.  More information here.

The OpenAFPM modelling tools can be used for designing Axial Flux Permanent Magnet (AFPM) generators for wind electric systems with the use of the open source finite element analysis software ‘Finite Element Method Magnetics’ (FEMM). This series of design tools have been developed by the Rural Electrification Research Group (RurERG), which is part of the Smart RUE (Smart grids Research Unit of the Electrical and Computer Engineering School) of the National Technical University of Athens (NTUA), in order to assist designers and practitioners involved with small scale wind electric systems.

The OpenAFPM tools series consists of three design tools named MagnAFPM, UserAFPM and OptiAFPM. The tool MagnAFPM can be used for designing a generator for a specific set of rotor blades and a specific set of permanent magnet dimensions. The tool UserAFPM can be used to validate the performance of a specific generator geometry by performing a finite element analysis using FEMM. The tool OptiAFPM uses the particle swarm optimization (PSO) to optimize the dimensions of the permanent magnets used in the generator design for a specific set of rotor blades, while minimizing the generator’s efficiency, cost and/or mass.

The creation of the online user interface of the OpenAFPM modeling tools has been supported by WISIONS as part of the project ‘Online Design Tools for Locally Manufactured Small Wind Turbines’.

Follow the link to visit the home page of the OpenAFPM tools and try them out!

Posted in construction, Notices, People | 3 Comments

Courses happening in March and April

There are several wind turbine construction courses happening around the world in March and April.

The Handy Village Institute is preparing for their third Homebrew Wind Turbine Workshop, with Dan Bartmann as guest instructor, March 19-24, 2018, near Saxapahaw, North Carolina 27253, USA.
Details and registration information: handyvillage.com.

500RPM are holding four classes in Buenes Aires on 3,4,10 and 11th March

Tripalium are holding 3 courses in April in France and Portugal and plenty more thereafter.  The workshop in Portugal 16-20th April will be conducted at least partly in English.

V3 Power will be holding a workshop at CAT Sat 28th – Sun 29th April 2018

I try to keep my list of courses updated.  Click the link for “courses calendar” in the black menu bar above.

Posted in courses, Notices | Leave a comment

email contact with me

I have been disturbed to learn that some emails sent to me have not arrived and my provider has not been able to explain or fix the issue yet.  So if you are trying to get in touch and have not had a reply then it is possible your message has got lost, sorry.

I always reply to emails.  If you get no reply then please try my gmail address which is scoraigwind”at”gmail.com.  (Insert @ for “at”)

Please also mention to me if you have had problems with my usual
hugh”at” scoraigwind.co.uk
address, and if possible send me extra details, such as any failure messages you got back.  Thanks.

Posted in Notices | Leave a comment

Secondhand Proven 6kw & Windy Boy Inverter

Richard Copland writes:

I have a Proven 6kw and a Windy Boy inverter that I would l like to sell as it is on land that is due to be sold (the buyer does not require the turbine).

Is this something that you would be interested in or know of someone who would be? I am based in Kent.

Many Thanks

Richard 07909558244

 

Posted in stuff on offer, UK small wind scene | 2 Comments

Handy Village Homebrew Workshop, with Dan Bartmann

The Handy Village Institute is preparing for their third Homebrew Wind Turbine Workshop, with Dan Bartmann as guest instructor, March 19-24, 2018, near Saxapahaw. Details and registration information: handyvillage.com.

FlyerEddy2018Turbine

Posted in construction, courses, Notices | 4 Comments

Charge controllers – a brief introduction

Why do we need charge controllers? To prevent batteries from being damaged by charging too hard.  As you charge a battery, its voltage rises, which is all good up to a point.  However if the voltage gets too high the battery may overheat, dry out explode etc.

How do charge controllers work? The controller monitors the battery voltage and limits the charging current to prevent it from pushing the voltage above a chosen level or “set-point”.  This diagram shows the process as recommended for Rolls batteries when used with SMA inverters.  There are several phases of battery charging, each with its own set-point voltage that the controller should observe.  These voltages are also temperature compensated (adjusted to allow for battery temperature rise or fall).

So it can get pretty complex.  But a simple charge controller that limits the charge rate to prevent a 12V battery from exceeding 14V during charge may be all that you need in reality.  Make sure that your charge controller is set correctly for the battery make and type.  Sealed batteries (gel type), for example, may need lower settings for safe operation.

How do they limit the charge rate? Solar charge controllers are wired between the solar array and the battery so that they can act like a switch and turn off the charging current.  Mostly they will do this in rapid pulses and control the average charge rate by the width of the pulse (Pulse Width Modulation or PWM).  (Often nowadays they will also use Maximum Power Point Tracking or MPPT but this has nothing to do with charge control.  It’s just an additional separate function of the charge control device, to improve the performance of the solar array.)

It’s not a case of turning off the charge when the battery is “full” so much as optimising the charge rate from maximum available current at first, down to a trickle charge current into a well charged battery on float.

What is diversion charge control and why is it better? Another way to limit battery charge rate is to divert current away from the battery and into a “dump load” otherwise called a diversion, ballast, or shunt, that is almost always some kind of heater/resistor to dissipate the excess energy safely as heat.  The controller is often connected directly to the battery rather than between battery and source.  The dump load is chosen so that it can use all the current you will get that is not controlled in any other way.  But it must not exceed the amperage capacity of the controller itself.  There are two advantages to using the energy rather than switching the current off.

  • One is that it can provide useful energy harvest (for making hot water for example and avoiding the need to burn fuel).
  • Another is to prevent overspeed of disconnected wind or hydro turbines where these are the source of the energy.

An unloaded turbine speeds up and becomes noisy, adding to wear and tear and producing higher output voltage that can destroy the controller.  If you only have solar and you do not need hot water then there is no advantage to a diversion controller.

What’s the best way to control a hybrid system (with both solar PV and wind/hydro turbine)? You can do this with one big diversion controller.  The controller connects to the battery and the charging sources each connect directly to the battery.  Here is a typical wiring diagram.  You can buy an MPPT controller (to improve performance) but you don’t have to.  Actually I find that a standard grid-tied solar panel connected directly to a 24V battery is close enough to its maximum power point that you don’t need MPPT for short wire runs.  Or you can use a solar MPPT controller (and a hydro MPPT controller) alongside a diversion controller.

Will the charge controllers conflict with each other in a hybrid system? Where you have a solar(usually MPPT) charge controller and a wind or hydro diversion charge controller on the same battery then the settings for both controllers must be suitable for the battery type.  They may not agree perfectly as to the set-point voltage for optimum charging all of the time and at every stage, but they don’t need to.  Think of them as a committee of experts.  Committees rarely agree, but whoever you listen to is probably going to do a good job, being an expert after all.

What happens if the diversion controller is not big enough to dump the solar power? You might have a hybrid system with 2kW of solar PV working 2 sun-hours per day and 200W of hydro working 24 hours.  (The wee hydro produces more kWh of energy than the solar.)  The dump load should be sized for the hydro (at least 200W).  What happens if it starts to dump solar power?  The dump load itself has an inherent maximum current.  So long as the diversion controller can handle the current in the dump load on 100% duty there is no problem.  It will not be overloaded.  If this fails to control the battery voltage then it will rise slightly and the solar controller will back off solar current and limit the charge rate according to its (slightly different) chosen set-point.

How do I set the controllers to make best use of the solar power to heat water? If your diversion controller is heating water then you may want it to produce as much as possible.  In this case you should set the voltages slightly lower in the diversion controller and slightly higher in the MPPT one so that the diversion operates first on rising voltage and the MPPT acts as a safety net if the diversion load is maxed out and the voltage rises further.  Make sure that both controllers have setting that are acceptable to your battery.  Set your hydro MPPT controller to the highest set-points of all so that your hydro is never unloaded.  This controller is only valuable for MPPT function (and it’s also comforting as a safety net in case the diversion control fails).

Where can I get a diversion controller? The best ones on the market are the Morningstar Tristar 45 and Tristar 60 controllers.  The Xantrex C40 is kind of OK but a lot less stable in operation.  There are not many other commercial ones available.  Here is one.    Missouri wind and solar offer one but I don’t know if they are good (comments?).

You can find low cost ones that divert hundreds of amps via a relay but these are rather crude in operation.  Most diversion controllers have a diversion mode and a solar mode so make sure you understand the difference and configure the controller correctly for your needs.  Some divert directly off the turbine and stall it so it slows down but these will not give you much useful hot water from a wind turbine in low winds.

Can I make my own charge controller? Yes indeed.  It’s a fun DIY electronics project.  I have made a lot of them in the past but to be honest the Tristar is cost-effective and much better in so many ways.  But I will try to do another post soon with details of various DIY charge control projects.

 

 

 

Posted in Diversion load control, products/technical, wind systems tutorial | 6 Comments

Another design proposal from Adriaan Kragten

Adriaan tells me:

“Recently I have written report KD 645 about the design of a new type 10-pole radial flux PM-generator with no iron in the coils and a simple 1-layer winding. This report can be copied for free from my website www.kdwindturbines.nl at the menu KD-reports.”

This is a ten pole design with 3-phase output using a standard motor body to enclose the working parts.  It’s great for keeping the magnets dry!  There is no iron in the stator which should mean it will be easy to start with no iron loss.  I suspect there will be some eddy current loss in the motor body (not shown in drawings) that encloses the coils.  Cooling of the coils will not be very effective though, which will place a limit on the continuous power output of the turbine.

The magnetic flux will be very weak and the actual performance (voltage per coil-turn per rpm) is yet to be determined.  Adriaan tells me “the costs of a PM-generator with an iron stator and about the same maximum torque level are much lower.”

I have no intention to build a prototype and test it but it would be good if someone else would test this idea. If the generated heat in aluminium is too high, one should use a housing made out of a synthetic material.”

PS: Adriaan further tells me he has designed a very small version “I have designed a 10-pole hub dynamo for a bicycle using the same principles as used for the 10-pole dynamo as described in KD 645. However, for the hub dynamo the rotating armature is at the outside and the stator with coils is at the inside. Although this dynamo is especially designed to be used in a bicycle, it might also be possible to use it in a very small wind turbine with a diameter of about 1 m. The idea is described in the note: “Ideas about an ideal hub dynamo” which can be found at my website: www.kdwindturbines.nl at the bottom of the menu “No wind energy”. There is also a Dutch version of this note which I have sent to a Dutch bicycle magazine to be published but I don’t know yet if they will accept the note or a summary of it.”

Posted in construction, People | Leave a comment

A new alternator for my little AWP windmill

I don’t usually write much at all about the stuff I get up to, but here is a story of my smaller wind turbine having an upgrade last month when I replaced the alternator.  I was helped by my friend Jonathan Schrieber.

Let’s start with a photo of the African Windpower turbine I erected behind my house in 2007.  It’s a design I did for manufacture in Harare in 1996 or so.  Already here it has a Scoraig tail and Scoraig wooden blades.  It was connected to my 48V batteries.  There weren’t so many trees around in 2007 or they were small.

 

 

 

 

Here’s a picture of the wooden blades carved by my neighbour Michel Grenier.  The fibreglass ones from Africa work ok, but they tended to break a lot, which is why we needed to replace them.  Wooden ones seem to last longer.

 

Here’s a shot of the AWP alternator.  It’s built with ferrite magnets inside a cast iron “drum” and it has a laminated steel core.  It’s really heavy (70kg) and tends to overspeed in high winds due to the fact that the steel core limits its output current.  Nowadays I prefer the axial flux design and that’t what we made to replace this one when its stator insulation failed.

Hoisting it up on a 20 metre tower using a gin pole and Tirfor rope hoist.  Tower diameter is 89mm overall (3″ steel pipe) which is a bit slender and snaky.

From the rooftop of the house.


It hasn’t been without it’s dramas over the last ten years.  For example here is the result of a severe storm in 2015 when the shaft snapped and the rotating parts fell to the ground.  I decided not to run it so hard after that.  I’d been using a Midnite Classic to drive it a bit hard and get more power out of it.

By the time I had fixed everyone else’s windmills (quite a bit of damage in that storm, so it took six weeks) and took my one down, the shaft fracture had already rusted a bit.  Or maybe it had been cracking for a long time…?

Seen from the big windmill.

The AWP windmill ran nicely for 2 years or more after this fix, but some time in August this year I noticed it was running poorly and producing low power.  There is a data logger on it and you can even see what it is producing right now to the right of this column in the little chart.  The stator had an internal short that I was unable to remedy without a rewind.

Here is Jonathan winding the first coil for the axial flux replacement alternator following this year’s insulation failure.  Rewinding the older stator is extremely laborious and anyway I prefer axial flux nowadays so glad to move on to the newer design shown below.

 

We used 60 turns of 2-in-hand 1.4mm diameter wire.  The coils came out just right to fit 15 coils in the stator.  We put 20 ferrite magnets on each steel rotor disk.

I like to use stainless steel wire reinforcement around the magnets prior to casting them in resin.  This has stood the test of time.  I don’t use glass cloth with ferrites, because the magnet stand proud in the resin without covering.  They don’t need protection from anything, as they are extremely robust.  Not a corrosion time-bomb like NdFeB magnets!

A rotor in the mould ready for resin.  The handle makes it easier to lift into place.

 

Here’s the stator.  10.2kg weight. Over 7kg of that is copper.

The frame of the machine ready for building the alternator.

Mounting the back magnet rotor (24.5kg) onto the big trailer hub.

The whole assembled windmill hanging off a hoist, waiting for the wheelbarrow. Over 100kg.

We didn’t have time to do much to the old blades.  They were still in perfect balance when checked sitting on a spike at the exact centre.  Leading edges were in good shape so I guess I must have done them within the last five years.

Easing the machine onto the tower top.

The down-tower wiring strapped onto its supports ready for crimp connections to the stator tails. I use small bore copper pipe to crimp the wires after they are tightly twisted together within the pipe.

A quick coat of linseed oil on the rusty metalwork.

Fitting the blades. We added an extra piece of birch plywood for luck.

Ready for lift-off. The trees have grown a bit since 2017.

Up and running sweet and smooth. I made the tail telescopic but I don’t think I will need to adjust it. Governs out at about 1200W average power.

Magnets – 20 per rotor – 75x50x20 ferrite Y30BH C8

Coils 15 of them 60 turns of 2×1.4mm dia. wire 460g each.

Nominal cut-in for 48V DC is 134 rpm.  1200W rated output at 260 rpm

Blade diameter 3.6 metres

Rotor lateral offset for furling 200mm.

Tail hinge angle 15 degrees.  Tail moment of weight 29 kg-metres.

Vane area around one square metre of 9mm birch plywood.

 

Posted in construction, ferrite magnets, my own projects, Scoraig | 6 Comments